<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Litwack.org &#187; books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.litwack.org/category/books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.litwack.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What if Amazon ruled publishing,</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2011/10/18/what-if-amazon-ruled-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2011/10/18/what-if-amazon-ruled-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/?p=2986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Atlantic asks. Functionally, I think they&#8217;d publish almost everything that meets a minimum set of formatting guidelines. The tiers would go like this, I think: The Morlocks Your cousin has a book of poetry, a guy whose blog you &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2011/10/18/what-if-amazon-ruled-publishing/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/print/2011/10/what-would-happen-if-amazon-ruled-publishing/246854/">The Atlantic</a> asks. Functionally, I think they&#8217;d publish almost everything that meets a minimum set of formatting guidelines. The tiers would go like this, I think:</p>
<p><strong>The Morlocks</strong><br />
Your cousin has a book of poetry, a guy whose blog you read wrote a YA novel. No advances, no promotion, no editing, Kindle sales, physical copies printed on demand. But: why wouldn&#8217;t  Amazon &#8220;publish&#8221; them? There&#8217;s food at the bottom of the pond, ask a catfish.</p>
<p><strong>The Mid-List</strong><br />
Authors previously published through the old model, promising newcomers. No advances, targeted promotion within Amazon.com (which is where people who buy books are looking for books anyway), editing, physical copies printed on demand. In the past, you could maybe make a living at this tier just writing and touring books. Now you probably can&#8217;t. </p>
<p><strong>Stars</strong><br />
Steven King, Tim Ferriss. Strawberries dipped in caviar, big advances, broad promotion, favorite editors hired by Amazon, big piles of printed books waiting to ship. </p>
<p>The Atlantic piece ends:</p>
<blockquote><p>When one company holds the keys to the kingdom for what content consumers can see on its device, it has a lot of power as to what kind of information reaches people. [...] If Amazon consolidates its power in the publishing industry, what would become of a book criticizing Amazon? The value of the publishing industry is at least in part in the competition among ouses, which means that if one place passes over a manuscript, someone else might see value in it. As Amazon&#8217;s power grows, we better hope that it doesn&#8217;t become the only show in town.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think Amazon would publish a book criticizing Amazon because they&#8217;d carry one, viz. their <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?ie=UTF8&#038;nodeId=15015801">Content Guidelines</a>. Which doesn&#8217;t distinguish between publishers and vendors &#8211; much like Amazon itself.  And if they were to get too restrictive on content, an opportunity for disruption would arise, probably in the form of books-as-apps vs. the sale of files that require a reader. It&#8217;s not like you need to buy a printing press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2011/10/18/what-if-amazon-ruled-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men, Women &amp; Children by Chad Kultgen</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2011/07/23/men-women-children-by-chad-kultgen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2011/07/23/men-women-children-by-chad-kultgen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 05:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/?p=2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I read this book and had a conflicted reaction to it, but when I googled Chad Kultgen I realized something: years ago my agent had given me a draft copy of his first novel, The Average American Male. My &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2011/07/23/men-women-children-by-chad-kultgen/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I read this book and had a conflicted reaction to it, but when I googled Chad Kultgen I realized something: years ago my agent had given me a draft copy of his first novel, <em>The Average American Male</em>. My agent is a young beautiful woman who is definitely not a sociopath, so after reading a chapter I wondered if she&#8217;d read it, and if so what a weird position she was putting herself in by giving it to me. Weird because if the message was &#8220;be more commercial, like this thing,&#8221; then she was trying to encourage me to write things that were okay for me but specifically pretty bad for people like her. What I read was like Tucker Max Jr., Seven-11 store brand energy drink pissed out and dried in 12 point Courier: the voice of a young white man figuratively butchering beautiful young women and fetishizing the parts. It was like the literary endpoint of Spike TV&#8217;s programming strategy &#8211; worse than boring, just obvious.</p>
<p>Had I realized this dude wrote <i>Men, Women &#038; Children</i> I would have passed but I didn&#8217;t and I didn&#8217;t. There&#8217;s some grim shit in it and worse than the headlines (bulimia! suicide!) is the cataloging of the specific kinds of pornography some of the thirteen-year-old characters are aroused by, the play of that in their lives, and the accompanying social network messaging.</p>
<p>The sickness of division subjected on the young is a true and sad observation, as is the book&#8217;s underlining of the tension between our external Facebook-y faces and the increasingly fractured and obscenely specific things we do in private. I mean, I&#8217;m building a copy of a watch that was commissioned by CERN to withstand magnetism which is as gross and exclusively enabled by the internet as any niche porn fetish on the internet. </p>
<p>If I were Chad Kultgen reading this I would probably be thinking <em>fuck you, I&#8217;m a good writer, who are you to judge me and what have you ever done?</em> which is fair. I get the sense from the two interviews I read that he&#8217;s frustrated by critics/ex-girlfriends not understanding that just because you write about something it doesn&#8217;t mean you are that thing or sympathize with that thing. Also fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2011/07/23/men-women-children-by-chad-kultgen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recent bookmarks and purchases</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2011/06/04/recent-bookmarks-and-purchases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2011/06/04/recent-bookmarks-and-purchases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 06:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/?p=2815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Den Brooks @ Dribble: Captivating &#8220;corners&#8221; 3d series. Project Euler: Have fun learning to code by cracking math problems, brought to my attention by this Atlantic article. Seth&#8217;s Palookaville 20: Issue 20 of Seth&#8217;s long-running comic includes part four of &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2011/06/04/recent-bookmarks-and-purchases/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dribbble.com/Brooks">Den Brooks @ Dribble</a>: Captivating &#8220;corners&#8221; 3d series.<br />
<a href="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/5738098912_276bb73f88_o-1.jpg"><img src="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/5738098912_276bb73f88_o-1.jpg" alt="" title="5738098912_276bb73f88_o (1)" width="800" height="600" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2816" /></a><br />
<a href="http://projecteuler.net/">Project Euler</a>: Have fun learning to code by cracking math problems, brought to my attention by <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/print/2011/06/how-i-failed-failed-and-finally-succeeded-at-learning-how-to-code/239855/">this Atlantic article</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.drawnandquarterly.com/shopCatalogLong.php?item=a4c0688ad307a1">Seth&#8217;s <em>Palookaville 20</em></a>: Issue 20 of Seth&#8217;s long-running comic includes part four of his Clyde Fans story and a photoessay on the seriously great imaginary city of Dominion he built out of cardboard. Also good from Drawn &#038; Quarterly this year is Chester Brown&#8217;s <em>Paying For It</em>, although I found his backmatter polemic worryingly naive.<br />
<a href="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Dominioninstallationview1.jpg"><img src="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Dominioninstallationview1.jpg" alt="" title="Dominioninstallationview1" width="600" height="456" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2817" /></a><br />
Additive resin 3D printing: <a href="http://www.chemshapes.com/">ChemShapes</a> is trying to do an open-source printer although the blog is kind of all over the place [ed. don't throw stones, Litwack] and a comprehensive plan seems far away &#8211; more promising is <a href="http://3dhomemade.blogspot.com/">Junior Veloso&#8217;s printer</a> although it seems he will not be open-sourcing every element of it. Meanwhile dudes at the Vienna University of Technology have theirs done and say it costs €1200 although there are no plans or further details. I would buy one, Vienna University of Technology: hurry up.<br />
Speaking of buying things:<br />
<a href="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/neo.jpg"><img src="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/neo.jpg" alt="" title="neo" width="480" height="640" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2825" /></a><br />
Yeah, I bought a Neo Geo MVS 4-slot. Plus Windjammers. I don&#8217;t do things the normal way; I do things the enormous way<br />
<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0FowchEqquQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2011/06/04/recent-bookmarks-and-purchases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I don&#8217;t know whaaaaat&#8217;s wrong with me</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2011/03/30/i-dont-know-whaaaaats-wrong-with-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2011/03/30/i-dont-know-whaaaaats-wrong-with-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/?p=2748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but I saw the cover of Paul Allen&#8217;s book, which I though was so funny: and spent fifteen minutes on this: Yes, pretty much all I think about is pork, kitties, and Wu-Tang. Maybe they can work on a beard &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2011/03/30/i-dont-know-whaaaaats-wrong-with-me/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but I saw the cover of Paul Allen&#8217;s book, which I though was so funny:<br />
<a href="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ideaman.png"><img src="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/ideaman.png" alt="" title="ideaman" width="297" height="450" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2749" /></a><br />
and spent fifteen minutes on this:<br />
<a href="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-30-at-3.29.56-PM.png"><img src="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-30-at-3.29.56-PM.png" alt="" title="Screen shot 2011-03-30 at 3.29.56 PM" width="396" height="512" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2751" /></a><br />
Yes, pretty much all I think about is pork, kitties, and Wu-Tang.</p>
<p>Maybe they can work on a beard filter for Photoshop CS6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2011/03/30/i-dont-know-whaaaaats-wrong-with-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Google Chat with Tao Lin</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2009/10/14/my-google-chat-with-tao-lin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2009/10/14/my-google-chat-with-tao-lin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/?p=2425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tao Lin is the author of at least two wonderful books (2/2 for the ones I’ve read), Eeeee Eee Eeee and his most recent, Shoplifting From American Apparel, which you should go buy right now; it’s one of my favorite &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2009/10/14/my-google-chat-with-tao-lin/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://heheheheheheheeheheheehehe.com/">Tao Lin</a> is the author of at least two wonderful books (2/2 for the ones I’ve read), <a href="http://http://www.amazon.com/Eeeee-Eee-Eeee-Tao-Lin/dp/1933633255/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1255550451&#038;sr=8-4"><em>Eeeee Eee Eeee</em></a> and his most recent, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shoplifting-American-Apparel-Contemporary-Novella/dp/1933633786/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1255550291&#038;sr=8-3">Shoplifting From American Apparel</a></em>, which you should go buy right now; it’s one of my favorite books I read this year, easily. A few days ago, I <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&#038;item=260487094617&#038;ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT">won an eBay auction</a> for a 30 minute conversation with him on Google Chat. Here it is. (We went a little bit over on time.)<br />
—</p>
<p> ‪me: ‬ ‪Hi Tao, I’m here if you’re ready‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hi geoff, i’m ready‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪outstanding‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪is your last name ‘litwack’‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪Yes‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hehe, nice‬<br />
thought it was something about ‘literary’ wack or something<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪ha ha‬<br />
no, family name<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i believe it’s from the original name for belarus‬<br />
which is ‘litwa’<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪but who knows‬<br />
i have a name question for you<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪ok‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪is your first name‬<br />
with a D sound?<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪no, T‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪I see‬<br />
ok<br />
i thought so but wasn’t sure<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i’m ‘down’ with D‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪mm‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what do you want to talk about?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i have prepared questions‬<br />
a few<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪sweet‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪after‬<br />
i would like you to give me some life advice<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪ok‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪and then if we have time we can have a free form discussion‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪sounds good‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪also, feel free to ask me questions‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪ok‬<br />
where are you?<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪first question‬<br />
oh i’m in LA<br />
the valley<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪nice‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪it’s ok‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪ok, first question‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪your current age‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪26‬<br />
you?<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪30‬<br />
i don’t feel 30<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what do you feel‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i feel 17‬<br />
and have for the past 13 years<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
i feel 60 sometimes<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yeah‬<br />
but that’s how i felt at 17<br />
old<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
how old did you think i was<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i thought you were 25‬<br />
i knew you were young<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i have turned 26‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪what’s your birthday?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪july 2‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
i’m june XX [Nb. redacted; this is the only thing in this conversation i edited except for one stupid spelling error on my part]<br />
so, close<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i may censor this on my blog in the interest of online security‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪online security, in what way?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪it’s a security question, your birthday‬<br />
for banking<br />
etc<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪oh, interesting‬<br />
i don’t mind<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i sound jewish, huh‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think i used my mother’s maiden name for security questions, or something‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yeah, that too‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i don’t anticipate having money that people can steal anyway‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪aww c’mon‬<br />
you are going to do fine<br />
i know it’s been a struggle so far<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hehe‬<br />
what other questions do you have?<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪ok‬<br />
i want to get the literary stuff out of the way<br />
i’m not a journalist or something<br />
so these are personal sort of<br />
first<br />
i read Shoplifting<br />
that was your first work i encountered<br />
i was v. impressed by it<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪my thought was‬<br />
i’m going to use your single quote marks here<br />
‘this is what i thought literature was going to be like in 2010, in 2000.’<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪’jesus’‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪sorry‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪then i used amazon prime to get e.e.e.‬<br />
which i strongly disliked for 20 pages, and then loved<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm, interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i initially misunderstood your intent‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what did you think my intent was at first‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪assuming i correctly understood it after those 20 pages‬<br />
crude postmodernism<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪in a reactionary way‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪given that postmodernism is now a dated form‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪how did you first ‘encounter’ ’sfaa’‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪good question‬<br />
on the web<br />
ah<br />
rex sorgatz<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪where‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪Fimoculous‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪who is that‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪blog‬<br />
he’s an old, old school blogger<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i’ve never heard of that‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪awesome dude‬<br />
fimoculous.com/<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪how old is he‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪35ish?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪nice‬<br />
what did he say<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪he mentioned it‬<br />
i believe he knew of you from before somehwo<br />
somehow<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪he’s from minnesota‬<br />
friends with diablo cody, chuck klosterman<br />
that set<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪is he famous?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪no‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪or seomthing‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪he’s more of a connector‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪a connector‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪rex, if you read this, i apologize if i have mischaracterized you‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪so anyway‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪rex‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪your work reminds me most of certain french writers‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting, who‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪Toussant, Robbe-Grillet and the Perec of “Things.”‬<br />
Not Houellebecq, as some have said<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm, i’ve read some of perec‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i love Perec‬<br />
not his later oulipo work<br />
i mean, i love that but you don’t remind me of it<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪does he have an afro‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪kind of actually‬<br />
he’s dead<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪’why’?‬<br />
how did he get an afro, i mean<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪jewish‬<br />
jewfro<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪oh yeah‬<br />
i see<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪um‬<br />
do you think of your work in the context of other writers?<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i’ve read half of a houllebecq novel‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪which one?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i don’t remember‬<br />
where he goes on vacation<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪oh uh‬<br />
atomized<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪and doesn’t ‘connect’ with the other people‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪or whatever they call it here‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪then i think he has sex with prostitutes‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yeah, lots of sex‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i view my work as in the tradition of the ‘kmart realists,’ as they were termed by tom wolfe and others‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪but on the main point‬<br />
this calvino idea of your book on a shelf with other books<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪yes, the group of writers called ‘kmart realists’ by journalists‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪okay‬<br />
so you identify with them<br />
ann beatie etc<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪do you know them at all‬<br />
yeah<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪not all of them‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i just like their writing and have been influenced by it in my writing‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪that’s good‬<br />
i am going to read them more extensively<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i recommend ‘chilly scenes of winter’ or ‘distortions’ by ann beattie‬<br />
and ‘honored guest’ by joy williams<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪great‬<br />
i will order those<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪nice‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪okay‬<br />
this is my next question<br />
about single quote marks<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪yes‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i pretyped this so i’m just going to paste it in‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hehe, ok‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪Your use of single quotation marks – my thought is you use them to sort of designate mind-watching-mind objects of what the buddhists call rigpa/vidya, to remove the reader from the flow of absorbtion and call their attention to the nature of a ‘cheeto’ or whatever. Or a feeling; ex. in your Twitter stream you write “found my ipod cord, ‘lightheadedly’ felt feelings toward it like it had been ‘disobedient’”. ‬<br />
‪It seems like you’re trying to strike at something cognitive, not something anthropological.‬<br />
do you agree with any part of that?<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪good job quoting my twitter‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪thank you‬<br />
 Sent at 12:14 PM on Wednesday<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪it seems like what you typed could be one thing i’m doing‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪okay‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i would say i’m not calling attention to the nature of a word, but calling attention to my ‘relationship’ with the word‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪and we intuit the nature of this relationship from context?‬<br />
obviously i guess<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪that i’m using said word ‘not literally,’ ‘with a definition different than the conventional definition,’ or that i’m ‘using the word with some degree of irony or sarcasm,’ or that i’m ‘taking a perspective different than my normal perspective for a moment, therefore “quoting” the word, from someone else’s perspective, that i assume the reader will know, to some degree’ (i think my use of single quotes isn’t consistent in this paragraph)‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
okay<br />
thank you<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪for example i feel uncomfortable using non literal language sometimes‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪me too‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪so i put quotes around it, so people know i feel uncomfortable, to some degree, using that language‬<br />
so they can know ‘who i am’ better<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪that discomfort is magic‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪so we can ‘connect’ more effectively‬<br />
for example if i read someone’s blog and they had a lot of non literal language or idioms i would feel less connceted to them, and less inclined to contact them to be friends with them<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i don’t know if you read my blog‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪but if they put quote marks around some of those idioms i would feel closer to them, and might want to contact them or something‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪did you feel it was literal or non literal?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i read some of it‬<br />
i think neutral<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪mmm‬<br />
that is fair<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i didn’t immediately label it literal or non literal, so maybe it was literal‬<br />
based on what i read and the level of thought i used re what i was reading<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪isee‬<br />
space<br />
i’m a screenwriter<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i saw your review of ‘the girlfriend experience’‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪being literal and shaving descriptions is v. important to me‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪did you say you didn’t feel it was substantial?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪sort of‬<br />
yes<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i liked her performance‬<br />
however<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪would you say then that ’sfaa’ isn’t substantial, as they both ’stay on the surface’ of things‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪no‬<br />
SFAA is very substantial<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪in part because of your use of time‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i se‬<br />
e<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪girlfriend experience shies away from film tropes‬<br />
which one level is good<br />
but on another, limiting<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what are you working on screenplay wise right now?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪the spec i wrote with my little sister‬<br />
we’re going out to studios with it next week<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪how old is she?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪23‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪sounds exciting‬<br />
what do you expect to happen<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i expect to make $32000 after taxes‬<br />
join the wga<br />
and write another spec with her<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪wow‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪not wow, Tao!‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪don’t have ‘need’ to get an agent though‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i have an agent‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪and the agent tries to sell it‬<br />
oh, nice<br />
damn<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i’m at CAA‬<br />
blowing my own horn<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪nice‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪thank you‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i’ve made like $18000 in 6 years‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪but uh‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪on writing‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i know‬<br />
i was going to ask you about that<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪aren’t people supposed to be trying to option my books for movies‬<br />
and paying me money<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yes‬<br />
but<br />
your work is not adaptable, of the two i read<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪that’s what makes it good, in part‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪if you want to write a film, write a film, but don’t write something as bait for adaptation‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪seems like someone in hollywood should still be optioning my books‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪you are too talented for that bullshit‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪’just to be safe’‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪perhaps‬<br />
many options are for $0<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪ben stiller or someone‬<br />
i see<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪his company is Red Hour‬<br />
he has been working on an adaptation of Civillwarland In Bad Decline for ten years<br />
TEN YEARS<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yeah‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is he working on‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪with civilwarland, or in general?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪civilwarland‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪getting the script ‘just right’‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪to make it commercial‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪we have four minutes‬<br />
i have many more questions<br />
fuck<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i can stay a little longer‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪okay‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is your next question‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪your IQ‬<br />
i read it was 172 or something<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪haha damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪did you say that, or was that a cruel dig‬<br />
on the part of someone else<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think it wasn’t about me‬<br />
it was someone’s IQ in a book or something<br />
i think my IQ was tested at 139 or something<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i didn’t speak english‬<br />
well<br />
or osmething<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪jesus‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪so it might not be accurate‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪that’s a good result for no english‬<br />
i’m sure not<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is your IQ‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪it was tested when i was four‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪al gore’s IQ is 142‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪so i am sure the multiplier fucked things up‬<br />
i may still be the world’s smartest four year old<br />
155<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
were you in the ‘gifted’ program<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i am not that smart‬<br />
no, i didn’t go to school<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪you didn’t go to school‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i was homeschooled‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i left home when i was 16, though‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think i used to view people by their IQ, now i view people based on how well adjusted they are and how concretely they view things‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪exactly‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪which seems not on the same spectrum as IQ‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪totally‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪or not entirely on the same spectrum‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i prefer the new way‬<br />
also, no one talked about asperger’s in the 80s<br />
which i feel like is when iq was a popular measure<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
hm<br />
what is your next question?<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪next‬<br />
do you know Andrea Seigel, my BFF?<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm, the name seems familiar‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i think you may have exchanged email in 2007‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪ill search my gmail‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪ok‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪oh, is she a writer‬<br />
of ‘like the red panda’<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yes‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪oh, cool‬<br />
i read that book<br />
i see she emailed me saying she liked my ‘the stranger’ article about fiction writers<br />
i didn’t know that was her<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪oh, i see‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪how is she doing‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪not well frankly‬<br />
personal family reasons<br />
otherwise fine<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪how is her career going‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪Well‬<br />
she just signed with UTA<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is that‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪her junior adult book is coming out‬<br />
another big film agency in la<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
how old is she?<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪29‬<br />
turning 30 this year<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪we went to school together‬<br />
although we were not friends there<br />
she thought i was a stupid stoner<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪bennington?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i thought she was a weird goth‬<br />
no, brown<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪she was a goth?‬<br />
hehe<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪she got her mfa at bennington‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think i remember her looking goth in her author photo‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪she’s not goth now‬<br />
on the outside<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i consider myself to be kind of a goth, inside‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪although not with the victorian trappings, at all‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
goth<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i read your thing about juggalos‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪gothic‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪they’re kind of like degraded goths‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪haha‬<br />
degraded goths, damn<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪goths without a philosophy‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is the origin of the term ‘juggalo’‬<br />
seems weird<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i don’t know‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪jugs‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪floridia must be involved‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪seems really weird‬<br />
seems good, though<br />
there seem to be ‘millions’ of them<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yeah‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪seems weird‬<br />
what is your next question<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪next‬<br />
are there any visual artists you admire<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm‬<br />
i don’t think so<br />
i don’t know of any really<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪mmm‬<br />
that’s fine<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i like graphic novels by adrian tomine, chris ware, daniel clowes, jeffrey brown, joe matt, chester brown‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i have read all of those authors‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪julia wertz‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪her i don’t know‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪who is your favorite‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪hard to say‬<br />
i am moved by current art that<br />
i would understand if people don’t like<br />
kaws<br />
neckface<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪marc dean veca‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i don’t really feel ‘moved’ by anything that doesn’t have language, i think‬<br />
even music, i feel<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪even music?‬<br />
wow<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪maybe‬<br />
i’m not sure<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i remember crying to neutral milk hotel‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪if it has lyrics that counts as ‘language’ for me‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i feel moved by music with lyrics‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i have been moved by non-lyrical music‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is your next question‬<br />
do i seem ‘mean’<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i wonder if you know my ex-girlfriend‬<br />
no!<br />
not at all<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪who is she?‬<br />
oh, good<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪Nathalie Chicha‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪oh, damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪she lives in brooklyn‬<br />
you live in brooklyn<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i’ve never met her but i emailed a few times‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪really‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪let me serach my gmail‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪what did you talk about?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think i was trying to get her job‬<br />
as blogger for galleycat<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪at gallycat?‬<br />
ah<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪and then one time i was interviewing her‬<br />
for my journalism class<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
i thought you might know her, even though i had no basis for that thought<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn, seems like everyone knows everyone‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i am waaaay out at the fringe‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think i read a short story by her one time on ‘xconnect’ or something‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪she’s a talented writer‬<br />
i wish she wrote more<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is she doing now‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i don’t know‬<br />
i keep trying to get in touch with her, and she keeps not answering my email<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪nothing bad happened‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪is she on the internet still‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪she can just be avoidant‬<br />
no<br />
apparently not<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪danb‬<br />
damn<br />
interesting<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i still love her‬<br />
not romantically<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪damn‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪however‬<br />
i promised to love her always<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is she doing, if she has left the internet‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪and i am keeping that promise‬<br />
i honestly don’t know<br />
i know what her last job was, but i don’t know if she still has it<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪seems like she must have moved to a foreign country, or become a school teacher or something, to leave the internet‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪she left a while ago‬<br />
abandoned her blog<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm‬<br />
how long did you date her<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪three years almost to the day‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i just googled her and she has a tiwtter‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪does she?‬<br />
wow<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪with no tweets though‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪oh‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪are you fb friends with her‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yes‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
does she just add anyone<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i don’t know‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪or allow anyone to be her friend‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i’m sure she’ll add you though‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪’guess i’ll add her’ since i clicekd her page and am here‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪good idea‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪3 years, seems like a long time‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪it was my longest relationship‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm‬<br />
did you live in brooklyn then<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪no‬<br />
this was at college<br />
then she moved to iowa to get her mfa and i couldn’t hack it<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
damn<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪although we were basically breaking up before then‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i’ve known all the poeple you’ve asked me if i knew‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yes‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪interesting‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪but i’m out of people‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪seems like everyone just knows eveyrone‬<br />
do you have more questions<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪advice‬<br />
i know this is running on<br />
three things, if you have time<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i have time‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪while we’re on the topic‬<br />
how should i find a new girlfriend?<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm‬<br />
internet<br />
i’ve found my girlfriends on the internet<br />
my answer seems to be ‘internet’<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪through your work, or institutional sites?‬<br />
i don’t see you on okcupid<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪my blog‬<br />
and work<br />
i haven’t used any ‘institutional’ things<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i am blogging wrong‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪people i know have used those effectively, i think, though‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪okay‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪craigslist‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪really? that i find frightening‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what other advice do you want‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪you are extremely productive‬<br />
five books in very few years<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i would avoid craigslist, i feel‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪how do you stay so productive?‬<br />
do you have ‘tips?’<br />
 Sent at 12:46 PM on Wednesday<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think by naturally not having urges to ‘hang out’ with people, not having a tv, not having a personal or laptop computer for a long time (only library), and almost always wanting to ‘feel more sad’ or ‘analyze it more’ (causing ‘work’ to be produced) when feeling sad instead of ‘blocking it out’ by drinking alcohol or forcing myself to sleep‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪that is amazing‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪and when i have a girlfriend i feel satisfied in terms of ’social life’ with just the girlfriend‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i see‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪so i spend all my time away from them ‘working’‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i understand‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪what is your third item of advice‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪what do you do when you feel anxious, to overcome it?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm‬<br />
in social situations i just keep feeling anxious most of the time<br />
while alone i don’t really feel anxious<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪you don’t feel anxious alone no matter where you are in the world?‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪maybe sometimes i’ll think about ‘death’ and ‘the arbitrary nature of the universe’ and i’ll feel more calm/detached‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪that makes sense‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪if i’m in an anxiety causing situation, like being late to meet someone, i just think that if i focus on the anxiety it will just create more problems, so if i want to be more effective in solving my problem i should logically ‘choose’ to not feel anxious, and that usually works to some degree‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪you are more advanced than i am in that respect‬<br />
but that is good advice<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪well, it doesn’t usually work probably‬<br />
i’m not ‘zen’ at all, in my view, i get frustrated and annoyed a lot, it seems<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪mm‬<br />
in my mid 20s, i lost most of my anger<br />
that was a real loss<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪hm‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪so maybe the frustration is good‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i think i don’t have any anger at all‬<br />
i don’t know<br />
hm<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i just meant that maybe things we characterize as ‘negative’ can sometimes be ‘positive’‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪do you have other questions?‬<br />
i see, that makes sense<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪only if you are satisfied with this transaction‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪yes, i am very satisfied, how about you?‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪from the sale, to the execution of the conversation‬<br />
very satisfied<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i see your bid as a sort of donation to me, of which i thank you for‬<br />
and i’ll link the gchat if you post it, gaining you hits<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yes, thank you‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i enjoyed talking to you‬<br />
seems interesting re andrea/nathalie<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪yes‬<br />
they’re both amazing<br />
in their own ways<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪i completely forgot about them both‬<br />
but remember knowing a lot about each sort of at one time in the past<br />
seems interesting<br />
i am ‘holding in’ a lot of pee right now<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪okay‬<br />
go!<br />
but<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪thank you for bidding on the gchat and for chatting w/ me‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i want to say, i count myself as a true fan of yours and‬<br />
anxious await the next book<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪oh, good‬<br />
thank you<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪i will now friend you on facebook and post this to my blog‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪will check your blog periodically, i feel‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪wonderful‬<br />
 ‪Tao: ‬ ‪have a nice day‬<br />
 ‪me: ‬ ‪you too Tao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2009/10/14/my-google-chat-with-tao-lin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The queue</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2009/06/19/the-queue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2009/06/19/the-queue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/?p=2453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything I should add?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything I should add?<br />
<img src="http://litwack.org/photos/unread.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2009/06/19/the-queue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All &#8211; night &#8211; long</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2008/04/30/all-night-long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2008/04/30/all-night-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/?p=2176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ars Technica: New Orphaned Works Act would limit copyright liability: Huge, important story from last week and NO MENTIONS on the New York Times or any other major news outlet. Shameful. Anyway basically there are now House and Senate bills &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2008/04/30/all-night-long/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Ars Technica: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080425-new-orphaned-works-act-would-limit-copyright-liability.html">New Orphaned Works Act would limit copyright liability</a>: Huge, important story from last week and NO MENTIONS on the New York Times or any other major news outlet. Shameful. Anyway basically there are now House and Senate bills that would limit your exposure to litigation if you make a good-faith effort to determine the status of an orphaned copyright, fail, and republish it in some form yourself. So like Amazon and Google could put up full text of every single book they&#8217;ve scanned that&#8217;s in a grey area &#8211; and Amazon could actually sell these things on Kindle and deal with rights owners in a uniform way if they pop up and demand compensation. AWESOME. Link via Louis.</li>
<li><a href="http://lessig.org/blog/prager.pdf">Matt Prager on the WGA strike (PDF LINK)</a>: Now this is interesting: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0695108/">Matt Prager</a> asserts that spec screenplays which get bought and produced can never count as work-for-hire, and writes an essay about the consequences. You may not be interested in this, but it&#8217;s interesting. Via Lessig&#8217;s blog, where I went to check to see if he was involved in the 2008 version of the Orphaned Works Act &#8211; if he is, he&#8217;s not saying. (You know Prager works in Hollywood because his essay is set in American Typewriter.)</li>
<li>Engadget: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/04/30/disney-and-wowwee-team-up-on-cute-killer-bots-for-the-ironic-up/">Disney/WowWee Wall-E robot</a>: I might just have to get these for my nieces and nephews. <a href='http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/ultimatewall-e.jpg'><img src="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/ultimatewall-e-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="ultimatewall-e" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2177" /></a></li>
<li>Music: <a href="http://www.zshare.net/audio/11324353acd94738/">Kevie Kev, <i>All Night Long (Waterbed)</i></a>. Old school Sugarhill classic. It&#8217;s long, really really long, six minutes long, and you have to be in the right mood, but girl, will you meet me at the waterbed tonight?</li>
<li>Movies: Guy Maddin &#8211; <i><a href="http://www.rlslog.net/brand-upon-the-brain-2006-dvdrip-xvid-vomit/">Brand Upon The Brain!</a></i> The Rapidshare links still work&#8230;<a href='http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/2cyfytc.jpg'><img src="http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/2cyfytc-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Brand Upon The Brain" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2178" /></a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2008/04/30/all-night-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand Mall</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/grand-mall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/grand-mall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/grand-mall/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve been living with my iPhone for about a week and it&#8217;s great, best thing ever. The most valuable information is about how to accomplish your goals, and so far I&#8217;ve figured out a store&#8217;s new location and checked &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/grand-mall/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>So I&#8217;ve been living with my iPhone for about a week and it&#8217;s great, best thing ever. The most valuable information is about how to accomplish your goals, and so far I&#8217;ve figured out a store&#8217;s new location and checked a recipe while in a supermarket, those kinds of things. Very difficult to do with a Treo. Webclips are actually useful. My main complaint is: there needs to be a &#8220;mark all as read&#8221; button for email. And the battery life is so-so; you really have to charge up every night. If you&#8217;re thinking of getting one, word on the street is to hold out until late May, if you can.</li>
<li>Speaking of consumerism, recently I&#8217;ve been on a little bit of a rampage &#8211; robocopped a Billykirk weekend bag made by the AMISH and a <a href="http://www.loopwheeler.co.jp/store/index.html">Loopwheeler LW09 hoodie</a>. Next up is a messenger bag that can accommodate a laptop &#8211; my ACR/Bagjack is OK but not ideal. Initially I was looking at the <a href="http://www.timbuk2.com/tb2/products/laptop/blogger">Timbuk2 Blogger</a> &#8211; dorky but functional &#8211; but it turns out they&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.messmedia.org/041109-timbuk.html">shifted their production to China</a>, and although they claim to pay a fair wage to their workers, that&#8217;s obviously by local standards, and they don&#8217;t provide detail about hours worked, overtime compensation, etc. So now I&#8217;m thinking a <a href="http://www.tombihn.com/page/001/PROD/300/TB0810">Tom Bihn Imago</a>, made in Seattle or Montana, would work. Have I become a big fluffy bunny liberal in regard to labor? Apparently yes.</li>
<li>To read: Flowers of Evil, The Echo Maker, The Way Some People Die. There are still a bunch of movies I want to see, #1 of which is <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/warner_independent_pictures/snowangels/">Snow Angels</a>; the trailer looks great. My Wii is rad; I&#8217;m taking Super Mario Galaxy one level at a time, and Zack and Wiki is next; I&#8217;ve heard great things. Then No More Heroes.</li>
<li>Also, prepare yourself for a post about <i><a href="http://www.noendinsightmovie.com/">No End In Sight</a></i>, the Iraq documentary. It&#8217;s amazingly good; you owe it to yourself as a citizen to watch it. I think it&#8217;s better on video because I had to pause halfway through to digest this, like, incredible punch in the gut. Keep in mind that most of those interviewed are ex-Bush appointees.</li>
<p><img src='http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/niceassemblage.jpg' alt='niceassemblage.jpg' /><br />
<i>Nice assemblage; not mine</i></ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/grand-mall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stay Free</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/stay-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/stay-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jokes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/stay-free/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2008-1-28.png' title='2008-1-28.png'><img src='http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/2008-1-28.png' alt='2008-1-28.png' /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/28/stay-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two links</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/25/two-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/25/two-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/25/two-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Booksthatmakeyoudumb figured out the correlation between the ten most popular books at colleges as listed on Facebook and the average SAT scores for students at those colleges, and the result: people reading Atlas Shrugged aren&#8217;t as good at taking standardized &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/25/two-links/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://booksthatmakeyoudumb.virgil.gr/">Booksthatmakeyoudumb</a> figured out the correlation between the ten most popular books at colleges as listed on Facebook and the average SAT scores for students at those colleges, and the result: people reading Atlas Shrugged aren&#8217;t as good at taking standardized tests as people reading <i>Lolita</i>. Which might not be that damning, when you think about it. Also note the difference between &#8220;The Bible&#8221; and &#8220;The Holy Bible.&#8221;</li>
<li>Nathan Rabin&#8217;s <a href="http://www.avclub.com/content/feature/the_final_tally">Year of Flops</a>: Rabin watched 104 films that failed to earn and sorted them into successes, fiascos and failures &#8211; the reviews are a little giddy, but the list itself is informationally dense. I&#8217;ve seen fifteen of the 104 and will probably now check out <i>It&#8217;s All About Love</i>. I always wondered what happened to Thomas Vinterberg.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2008/01/25/two-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back, sorry</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2007/12/14/back-sorry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2007/12/14/back-sorry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/2007/12/14/back-sorry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luis: I still can&#8217;t believe it! Holy shit congrats again. SimpleDB is built on Erlang! Does anybody know of anything awesome in Scranton? No The Office jokes, please. Prodigy of Mobb Deep&#8217;s My World Is Empty Without You is amazing. &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2007/12/14/back-sorry/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Luis: I still can&#8217;t believe it! Holy shit congrats <strong>again</strong>.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.satine.org/archives/2007/12/13/amazon-simpledb/">SimpleDB is built on Erlang</a>!</li>
<li>Does anybody know of anything awesome in Scranton? No <i>The Office</i> jokes, please.</li>
<li>Prodigy of Mobb Deep&#8217;s <i><a href="http://www.spinemagazine.com/music/december/prodigy/myworldisemptywithoutyou.mp3">My World Is Empty Without You</a></i> is amazing. He claims his forefathers built pyramids on Mars &#8211; I missed you! H.N.I.C. 2 = most anticipated new album.</li>
<li>Via Louis I&#8217;ve become a huge fan of Ben Croshaw&#8217;s, uh, <a href="http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/zeropunctuation">video game podcast</a> or whatever you want to call it. The Peggle one is particularly funny.</li>
<li>You know what I bought that&#8217;s hippyish but I&#8217;m kind of in love with? This <a href="http://mysigg.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&#038;ProdID=478">Sigg bottle</a>. It holds about the same amount of water as a disposable plastic bottle, but it&#8217;s not disposable and has a pleasing form. It&#8217;s aluminum on the outside with some kind of non-leaching taste neutral liner inside. I&#8217;m unhappy about the plastic waste generated by water bottles AND pissed about their cost versus the tap, so this was a perfect little gift to myself.</li>
<li>There&#8217;s this fan-translated manga I&#8217;ve been reading that I like a lot &#8211; <i><a href="http://kotonoha.monkey-pirate.com/ongoing-series/historie/">Historie</a></i>, by Hitoshi Iwaaki &#8211; part fiction, part fact, it&#8217;s about the travels and development of Eumenes of Cardia, who would become Alexander the Great&#8217;s archivist. I&#8217;m a sucker for the ancient world.</li>
</ul>
<p><img src='http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/iquestion.jpg' alt='iquestion.jpg' /><br />
Grrr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2007/12/14/back-sorry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.spinemagazine.com/music/december/prodigy/myworldisemptywithoutyou.mp3" length="4364288" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big tech story today is the Amazon Kindle reveal in Newsweek</title>
		<link>http://www.litwack.org/2007/11/18/the-big-tech-story-today-is-the-amazon-kindle-reveal-in-newsweek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.litwack.org/2007/11/18/the-big-tech-story-today-is-the-amazon-kindle-reveal-in-newsweek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>geoffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.litwack.org/2007/11/18/the-big-tech-story-today-is-the-amazon-kindle-reveal-in-newsweek/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here. The Kindle, if you&#8217;re not familiar, is Amazon&#8217;s eink book reader. Bits of information about the device have leaked out since it was first spotted on the FCC&#8217;s website last September, but now Steven Levy has the whole story. &#8230; <a href="http://www.litwack.org/2007/11/18/the-big-tech-story-today-is-the-amazon-kindle-reveal-in-newsweek/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/70983/output/print">Here</a>. The Kindle, if you&#8217;re not familiar, is Amazon&#8217;s eink book reader. Bits of information about the device have leaked out since it was first spotted on the FCC&#8217;s website last September, but now Steven Levy has the whole story. In brief:</p>
<ul>
<li>$399, shipping this week. Very expensive, the price of an iPhone, which seems like an amount only nerds would pay.</li>
<li>Hardware: 10.3 ounces, six-inch black and white eink <del datetime="2007-11-24T14:03:35+00:00">touch</del>screen, 30 hour battery, &#8220;200 books onboard&#8221; &#8220;more with a memory card&#8221; which I&#8217;m going to guess will be SD, EVDO for buying books from the device.</li>
<li>Software: Some form of DRM &#8211; sounds like one purchase = use on one device, web browser, an email address for the device, annotations on texts, search, Amazon&#8217;s store. It can apparently read Word documents and PDFs, but no news on txt or rtf.</li>
<li>Pricing: Classic (read: public domain) books are $1.99, bestsellers and new releases in hardback $9.99 with backlist books presumably somewhere in between. There are also periodicals: The NYT, The Atlantic, others. Weirdly you can subscribe to blogs but have to pay $0.99-$1.99/mo.</li>
</ul>
<p>Two years ago I would have been really excited about this. Clearly the biggest deal is the wireless store and Amazon&#8217;s pricing, which, aside from the DRM and ripping you off on public domain stuff and RSS feeds seems reasonable, even thrifty. However, with the advent of high-DPI displays in mobile phones, I&#8217;m not sure that a single-purpose device like this will be successful at any price. The idea of <a href="http://dailylit.com/">DailyLit</a> emailing you 1000 word segments of a novel to be read on a phone might terrify the old guard, but fuck the old guard.</p>
<p>Update: me and Tim O&#8217;Reilly are <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/11/amazon_kindle_newsweek.html">on the same track here</a>.</p>
<p>Update 2: Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/kindle">product page on Amazon</a>. It costs 10¢ to email things to the device &#8211; I think that&#8217;s to cover a payment to Sprint for data transfer on their network.</p>
<p>Update 3: <a href="http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2007/11/19/15-things-i-just-lea.html">More from Joel Johnson over at Boing Boing Gadgets</a>. Notably PDF is totally unsupported and it&#8217;s possible that Amazon&#8217;s .azw DRM format and .txt are the only natively readable file formats.</p>
<p>Update 4: <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/11/19/the-future-of-reading">Mark Pilgrim rips the Kindle a new port</a>.</p>
<p><img src='http://www.litwack.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/picture-1.png' alt='picture-1.png' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.litwack.org/2007/11/18/the-big-tech-story-today-is-the-amazon-kindle-reveal-in-newsweek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

